
". . .
the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve . . ." Matthew 20:28
There are "full-service" churches like
Radiant in Surprise, AZ that provide everything for their worshippers from indoor playgrounds to retail shops to a drive-thru latte booth. A Car Show has been scheduled for the dads this Fathers' Day.
And then there are congregations like ours which serve with basic loving care. But sometimes people come through our doors with a disturbing sense of entitlement. Among the requests I've received over the years as a pastor, all with a sense that this is what I'm supposed to do for them:
- Could I run out to the store to pick up some aspirin for a parishioner at 11 PM?
- Could I find a babysitter for a church family for next weekend?
- (From the son of a parishioner) Could I pack up his mother's possessions and take what she didn't want to The Salvation Army before she moved to the retirement community?
And pastors aren't the only ones who receive such requests. I've known church officers who were asked to run errands, clean homes, and pay travel expenses for other members. The thought is that this is what the church is for: we join and people will take care of us.
Transients come through our doors and occasionally begin their conversation by asking, "Are you a church that helps people?" which is a bit of a trick question. And then they ask for bus passes, gasoline vouchers, grocery store gift cards, or cash.
Before you consider me a cold, heartless Scrooge, know that I believe there is a difference between loving service and entitlement. Elizabeth Steele wrote
How Responding to People's Needs Hurts the Church which you can read
here. She warns churches that trying to meet the personal needs of their parishioners leads to a trivialization of the church.
When people join a church to be served instead of to serve, the church's most basic identity is diminished. And already our congregations are confused.
- There are churches that are basically social communities offering great opportunities for meeting new people and nurturing friendships.
- There are churches that are basically wholesome values communities, teaching adults and children traditional civic values.
- There are churches that are social services communities housing the homeless and feeding the hungry.
While there is nothing wrong with nurturing friendships or teaching people to be solid citizens or caring for community needs, the church is a spiritual community in which we gather to support and equip each other to serve the world in the likeness of Christ.
There's nothing wrong with responding to people's needs in terms of the acts of mercy and kindness themselves. I find great joy in doing things for people.
The problem is in how people begin to understand the church as a service provider instead of a disciple-maker. Steele reminds us, rightly, that our congregations might indeed provide services to the community, but we "do it as an expression of (our) life as a community of faith."
A good question to ask ourselves is this:
Does my church serve my needs? Or does it make me a better follower of Jesus?
Painting is Christ Washing St. Peter's Feet by Ford Madox Brown (1852-1856).
12 comments:
This is a great post, Jan.
I thought about this sort of thing Sunday. 60 Minutes ran an interview with Joel Osteen, who preaches a form of prosperity gospel. And I wanted to shout at the television, "Ask not what your church can do for you. Ask what you can do for your God."
Great post.
Jan, I can't tell you how glad I am that you are writing things that I think and feel and believe but cannot seem to articulate.
And thank you for that wonderful link.
This has become my Daily Dose of Sanity!
WELL said, Jan!
Excellent post !!
Trying to get the Session at my church to understand its not 'their' church, but 'His'.
And that if a VBS program sees does not make sense in that it has never had enough volunteers to run it properly, and doesn't aid in evangelism as some say, it makes NO sense to run it just for their 4 or 5 little darlings.
What Cheesehead said. I saw that article and cheered...this is SO countercultural that I am convinced it is our most important witness. But it's so hard to work against the "me, me, me" idea. Thanks for your reflections.
I absolutely agree that the church is where we go to be equipped to serve others in Christ. That to me is the great commission.
But I have to say that this resistance to accepting serving and supporting each other to include day to day help is completely frustrating to me. There's been a bifurcation of the idea of spiritual equipping that has pushed away the mundane nitty gritty needs of the day to days.
I look at the Amish. They do it. And we don't.
I don't expect my church to DO for me. I expect my church to celebrate and support life so that all of us there can go and do likewise. And that includes creating and providing meaningful venues of support of the day to days that also include the lovely spiritual equipping that is now just provided in over and above extra venues none of us out here have any time for.
Sorry to go on. It just makes me weep because I would so love to do more, but can't because I have NO support anywhere. Least of all from my church.
PG - I completely agree that 1) our congregations must support each other and 2) yours is missing the boat in not supporting you. But there is a difference between supporting each other and catering to each other.
For example: we have a young family going through a terrible health situation and the congregation has been great about taking meals over, offering respite to the young mom, etc. She has just volunteered to take on a huge position in our church which happens to work for her in terms of her time, her gifts, and the fact that she can bring the baby. She wants to support the ministry of the congregation in this way because she has been ministered to. This kind of mutual care creates more care, spiritual connection, etc. But again, we haven't "catered to" her needs/desires; we've ministered to her as sisters and brothers in Christ. The difference is a fine line, perhaps, in some circumstances.
"my church meets my needs." There is so much wrong with this sentence.
A group from our church a few years ago passed out a "survey" (they were trying to oust the senior pastor) and one of the survey boxes was "the pastor meets my needs."
And I thought, if people think this is what church is about, we are doing something wrong.
The initial reason that someone walks through your doors on a Sunday morning is about personal needs. It's always about personal needs. The question is, what happens after that? You have touched on a good part of it.
CP
Thank you for pointing to a great resource and articulating important truths for us.
You rock.
I too saw this article in Alban's weekly email, and felt something incredibly important had been articulated very well.
I don't comment as often as I'd like, Jan. But your work here-- this blog ministry--- is powerful.
Post a Comment