It's been a busy couple of weeks: 3 deaths, 2 snowstorms, at least 1 angry parishioner. (Probably more than one.)Saturday, February 06, 2010
Snow Day
It's been a busy couple of weeks: 3 deaths, 2 snowstorms, at least 1 angry parishioner. (Probably more than one.)But I leave Sunday afternoon for a week of study leave with my clergywomen's Roundtable Preaching Group - a group that's been meeting for many years. This year's location: San Francisco. It will be refreshing to leave the snow behind and enjoy some warmish rain.
I'm so grateful for a culture of continuing education in my profession. Even on the flight I'll have time to finish reading this. Strongly recommend it for Lent.
More from SF later this week.
Photo of Shirlington Village in Arlington, VA.
Friday, February 05, 2010
This Spiritual Life
In the 4th grade Ms. D. read us a chapter of Charlie and The Chocolate Factory every day after lunch and It Was Awesome. Every day we breathlessly sat at our desks, while our sandwiches and Hostess Twinkies digested, waiting to learn something new about Charlie's search for the golden ticket or Violet's chewing gum or Veruca's rudeness. I will never forget it.This is the same feeling I get when I watch Lost - another great character-driven story. I can barely stand waiting another week to figure out what's going on with Sayid and Kate and Hugo.
My genius friend M believes that This American Life created by the great Ira Glass is what future church gatherings could look like. There is liturgy: "Act 1 - Hasta La Vista, Maybe." There is a a sense of hushed, prayerful reflection. There is holy poignancy. There is often laughter.
Can you imagine if the ancient stories of scripture made us feel breathless? Just as reading Charlie and The Chocolate Factory together as a class or watching Lost with other Lost fans makes the experience richer, hearing the earthy stories of our faith as a community is a sumptuous feast.
We often don't experience this though. The "feast" is often just a bland tidbit.
On the one hand, our culture is increasingly Biblically illiterate and we don't know the stories. On the other hand, those of us who know the Biblical stories have domesticated them. We are not in any way shocked by the Parable of the Prodigal Son. We are not horrified by the crucifixion. Maybe - because we already know the end of the story - the stories don't jolt us much.
Over the last two weeks, the lectionary lessons gave us a literal cliffhanger: Week 1 - Jesus reads the scroll in his hometown synagogue and the crowd loves him. Week 2 - He makes a couple comments that shift the crowd from adoring throng to enraged mob ready to fling Jesus off the town cliff. Those of us who know this story shrug. Those of us who don't know the story find it confusing.
This is a great story that requires some conversation. No longer is it enough for a preacher to hold forth on it's theological meaning. Instead, we need to hear personal stories that relate The Ancient Story to our own lives. Have any of us been rejected after speaking the truth? The honest answer is Yes.
I believe The Emerging Church seeks to connect our stories to The Story in a new way. No longer do we hear about Moses and Hannah and Esther and Jesus without connecting them to our own stories. No longer do we hear a sanitized version of these earthy tales and leave the sanctuary believing this is about someone else from a time long, long ago. These are our stories. There is rage and blood and joy and healing. There is bitterness and regret and loss. This is our spiritual life.
Ira Glass does a good job of connecting seemingly disconnected stories to The Theme of the Day. This is the job of a good spiritual leader too.
Over 25+ years of professional ministry, I've heard some amazing stories:
- The woman who grew up in an orphanage and could not be adopted by the family who had adopted her sisters until she had surgery to repair her curvature of the spine, and so she begged on the street until she attracted the attention of a local doctor who had pity on her and operated on her back at no charge.
- The women whose husband left her on skis one Christmas morning, not even waiting for the snow to be cleared on their street.
- The man who tried to convince his elderly father on his death bed that he was smart and successful, even though his father died without ever telling his son he was proud of him.
- The child whose father got so drunk at the airport bar that he got on his flight without her, leaving her in a strange airport at the age of 8.
These are the stories of our broken lives. And they parallel The Ancient Stories of scripture. One of my hopes for the Christian community of the 21st Century is that we might gather and sit breathlessly together while we share how God is redeeming these stories and our lives. There would be liturgy and prayer and a holy poignancy and laughter. We would be the church in a new way.
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
Same Wine, Different Skin?
As my particular congregation is facing particular changes in 2010 (two of our longest-term members have passed away in the last 10 days), I can't put it better than Brian McLaren in terms of what we need to do as a 21st Century Church: watch this.Brian's new book A New Kind of Christianity comes out next week.
Tuesday, February 02, 2010
Both/And
This post is a love letter to transient congregations like the one I serve now and to we've-always-done-it-this-way congregations like many we've known.The first congregation I served my first five years out of seminary is 207 years old and in a community where people have lived for generations. Like clockwork, there was A Certain Way of Doing Things:
- On Labor Day Weekend we sold burgers and fries at the county fair, and Sunday worship was held in a circus tent with the Catholics.
- Every Halloween, Father R. and I judged the costumes at the community parade down Main Street - and could expect small bribes from parents wanting their young fairy princesses and draculas to win.
- Every month, I moderated every meeting and led every Bible study because I was one of the few who had been to college, much less seminary and people figured the pastor must know best.
- Every summer, I would go to the Volunteer Firefighters' Banquet and eat wild game, alternating pre-dinner prayer duties with Father R.
And so it went. There were annual turkey dinners and annual Lenten studies and annual summer Bible studies on the porch of the manse where I lived. The funeral director always phoned me when someone remotely Protestant passed away with this greeting: "Guess who died?" Few things changed in the years I was with them.
I now serve a congregation that turns over in membership every couple of years. Our building is in a neighborhood surrounded by historic apartments and condos where people flock when they first come to Our Nation's Capital, often fresh out of graduate school. The majority of new people who come through our church doors are in their 20s and 30s, single or married without children, and they often move away within 5 years.
Like I said, it's very transient. Military members get transferred. Civilians decide they want a simpler lifestyle where the traffic isn't crazy and you can find a house with a yard for less than $500,000. People who decide they love living here often move to more affordable neighborhoods. Or maybe they move to even more expensive neighborhoods if their careers take off.
We rarely hear: "But we've always done it this way." Ideas are fresh and there are always new faces which keeps us on our toes in terms of hospitality. The regulars have to talk to strangers. Half the congregation are strangers.
But there's also a downside, I've realized, to such transience.
There is often chaos when someone dies, for example, over who's in charge of organizing the post-funeral plans because the new-ish parishioners are not familiar with our process. They jump in not knowing about procedures before jumping ,not because they are bossy, necessarily, but because they want to help and don't know realize that processes are in fact in place. They assume everyone is new to this.
When Advent rolls around, there is confusion over special offerings because newer members want to introduce their ideas and older members want to do what we've done previously, not realizing that the "long time tradition" they are touting is in fact only 2-3 years old.
Someone will invariably say "We should do a study on re-thinking Sunday School" when they don't realize that we already did an extensive study the year before they joined which was just 4 years ago.
Sometimes it feels like we are always re-thinking processes, re-working mission statements, re-writing job descriptions for officers and volunteers. That can be a good thing. But it also is time-consuming and emotionally tiring. And it can feel like we are going in circles, which, I'm certain makes many people frustrated.
I can see why some folks who are very committed to The Institutional Church find comfort in joining established churches with long-time customs and few changes. They know what to expect. People know their roles. Processes are in place.
The thing is that many of those customs need to be changed. Expectations need shifting. We all need to discover more faithful roles. And some of our processes are dated and perpetuate not-so-great ways of being the church.
Once again, we need both/and. We need both stability and change. We need both tradition and freshness.
We need pastors who are experts in both/and. But most of us are trained in what is "old" or what is "new" without learning how to incorporate both. [Seminary leaders: do you hear this?]
The first congregation I served is dying. They haven't had an injection of "the new" in so long, they have no idea it's possible. Few people are moving into their community, it seems. And the ones who grew up there often move away.
The congregation I now serve sometimes wonders if things are "falling apart" (the favorite expression of one former leader) because we are again re-thinking ways of being the church that were just introduced a few years ago. Do we want to re-visit 9:30 Church School? Do we want our officers to do things differently (again)? It feels chaotic.
So, here's the love letter part: if we focus on the ancient things in fresh ways I believe we'll be on the right path to be the church God wants us to be. It starts with the most essential commandments and is topped off by many of Paul's wisest words. We who love the church need to figure out ways to blend what is timeless with what is timely.
Painting is Bright Picture by Kandinsky (1913.)
Sunday, January 31, 2010
A Snowy Teaching Moment
"We canceled church today."This is a statement I'll be repeating myself or hearing others repeat several times today, but the reality is that canceling a single worship service and it's surrounding activities doesn't actually "cancel church." It doesn't "cancel worship."
One of the problems of the institutional church we love is that we have trained people to believe that we only worship God at 11:00 on Sunday mornings (or some other authoritatively appointed time.) We have taught each other that church happens only in certain times and places - namely on Sunday mornings in a church building.
Actually it is a much more ancient practice to worship God in all we do: shoveling snow, baking bread, folding laundry, singing songs. The very practice of doing all things to the glory of God is a soul-feeding activity. And it's Biblical.
Having said this, I believe it is essential for the people of God to gather intentionally as a congregation at least one time a week (but preferably much more often.) It was an easier call to make today to "cancel church" in the morning because we have two other gatherings scheduled for later in the day:
- a 3:00 memorial service to celebrate the life God gave to a beloved church member
- a 6:00 potluck dinner followed by 6:45 Holy Grounds.
I also made this "cancel morning church" call because we have some stubborn, yet wobbly people who believe that if there is a worship service in the morning (snow or no snow) that it is their responsibility to be there. It gives them bragging rights. It will make God happy to have made the extra effort.
We also, though, had a congregational meeting scheduled - with a sermon written for that particular meeting - and it just felt right to save it all for next week so that the maximum number of people would be present.But we didn't actually cancel church. The church was out and about this morning shoveling snow and offering rides and checking in on each other. It takes more than snow (or a cautious pastor) to cancel church.
Photo from yesterday's burial of a beloved sister at National Memorial Cemetery.Thursday, January 28, 2010
Entitlement
I love how the world occasionally comes together into one big "hello." - The lectionary Gospel lesson for Sunday is about Jesus ticking off his hometown when they realized they weren't entitled to special treatment just because they grew up drinking from the same water well.
- I did a random poll on FB yesterday about troublesome parishioners and M. wrote these wise words: (Stress-inducing church people tend to be . . .)
"The ones who feel entitled. Whether it's entitled to the pastor, entitled to services, entitled to space, entitled to jobs, entitled to God, entitled to make decisions, entitled to having their own needs met, etc."
- Even the POTUS alluded to this last night in terms of what big banks should expect.
All of us are excellent in missing the point. We gather as a church to worship and serve God, to try to figure things out (i.e. grapple with the hard issues of life - a nod to HG) and to find support and accountability through community. But all of us easily fall into a "this is mine" mentality sometimes. We don't want what means the most to us touched. We live with unarticulated expectations ("I thought that if I did this, I would get that.")
And even Lost goes there. (DON'T WATCH THIS IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN SEASON 5.)
When we expect to be treated special because of who we are (or who we think we are) we miss the point. It's not about us. It's about expanding the kingdom of God. (I know I'm a broken record, but I have to keep reminding myself too.)
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Rethinking Stats
It's that time of year again. All PCUSA congregations are supposed to turn in their statistical reports this week to Louisville.Statistics perennially seem to make us feel bad about ourselves (membership losses!) or give us amo for feeling important (look how big my church is!) but - honestly - I have changed my mind about the usefulness of statistical reports in a positive direction.
While some of the questions are dated (can we find a new way to identify mixed race members apart from "other"?) and we can make stats say what we want them to say, I also believe that church leaders should take their statistical reports on retreat and look at the big picture. What do our stats say about who we really are now and is that who they want to be?
IMAGINE CHURCH STATISTICS AS A VISIONING TOOL:
What are your numbers for infant vs adult baptisms?(for traditions that baptize both infants and adults)
If you have few or no adult baptisms, it probably means that all your members have been raised in the church.
Follow up question for leaders: Do we feel any responsibility to reach out to those who were not raised in the church? Do we even know anybody who wasn't raised in the church? (Believe me, they are out there, outnumbering us.) This hugely impacts our music, educational offerings, and dress code.
What are your age demographics and do they reflect where your energies go?
I always knew that our largest demographic was adults between 25-45, but I was surprised to learn this little tidbit:
In the congregation I serve, we have more voting members (i.e. "official members") in the 26-45 age group than in the other older age groups combined. (Other groupings: 46-55, 56-65, over 65) And that's not counting those under age 26. And it's also not counting the many young adults that will never join "officially" because they don't join things for various reasons, but they are committed to our community.
So, while we don't ignore other age groups, of course, it's interesting to take note of how much attention is given to which age group, generally speaking. For example, does the budget in my particular congregation reflect that most of its resources go to young singles/young families? Do our boards look like our congregation in terms of age representation? Does our staff look like our congregation? Or the congregation we want to be?
This is about context really. It doesn't make sense if we randomly decide we want to "get more young families" but our neighborhood is a retirement community. The neighborhoods surrounding our particular church building match our demographics pretty well. How about yours?
As officials in suits receive church statistical reports in the coming weeks, they might wring their hands over losses. But my hope is that we in the local churches take stock of where we are and that we increasingly become the church for our neighborhoods . . . which may not sound like good news for those who don't live near their church buildings anymore but want the church to look like them. (e.g. if you expect your church to grow without engaging the surrounding neighborhood, it's not going to happen.)
The image is the cover the of book Beautiful Data: The Stories Behind Elegant Data Solutions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


